Lisa Delpit’s The Silent Dialogue discusses culture conflict in the classroom,
concerning communication blocks between parties that believe they have the same
aim. While reading this article, several statements Delpit wrote stood out to
me.
The first statement is “success in
institutions – schools, workplaces, and so on – is predicted upon acquisition
of the culture of those who are in power”. Delpit uses an example that
middle-class children tend to do better than children who are not middle-class,
simply because the culture of the school is based on that of the upper and
middle-classes. The Guardian, a winner of the Pulitzer Prize, claims
middle-class students do better because parents and schools put more effort
into their education. Parents are more likely to push their child to do better,
which can have an influence on the school’s effort. "The
parents' background also increases the school's effort, which increases the
school achievement. Why schools work harder where parents are from a more privileged
background we do not know. It might be because middle-class parents are more
vocal in demanding that the school work hard. Influencing parental effort is
certainly something that is much easier than modifying their social
background." (http://www.theguardian.com/education/2010/oct/29/middle-class-children-better-school)
I firmly believe that students have the ability to push themselves to do their
best, but they will ultimately be more successful if they have support from
their school and family. I’m not saying students who are not in the
middle-class don’t get support, but I can’t help but wonder how this support
may or may not differ from the middle-class.
Another statement that stood
out to me was the suggestion that “each classroom incorporate strategies
appropriate for all the children in its confines”. When teaching a class of 23
children, one needs to present information and knowledge to them in a way
everyone can understand. This relates to my father, a former elementary music
teacher. When teaching a new concept, he would present something to the
students in three different ways, ensuring that everyone understood.
A third statement that stood
out was “to deny students their own expert knowledge is to disempower them”. Similar
to the Lake reading, teachers need to accept the different experiences each
student goes through. By doing so, teachers can even turn to the students to
teach through their own knowledge. One never knows what a student can bring to
the class until they are able to express their own culture.
Teaching will never be an easy
job, but as long as students are able to embrace where they come from and get
support for it, then the job can be an experience unlike any other.
Your third quote made me think of how we are going into Providence schools and experiencing different cultures. We will definitely have to accept the difference experiences that each student goes through.
ReplyDeleteYour third quote made me think of how we are going into Providence schools and experiencing different cultures. We will definitely have to accept the difference experiences that each student goes through.
ReplyDeleteI just wanted to let you know that I mentioned you in my piece. Also, I liked your point on the fact that middle-class children or those who come from money are given more opportunities in school. I 100% agree with that statement.
ReplyDeleteI love how you made personal connections to your quotes! It really shows you understood what you were reading. I totally agree with the statement that middle-class children or students who come from wealthy families have better success in school.
ReplyDeleteI also talked about the first quote in my blog and I agree. I love when you said "It might be because middle-class parents are more vocal in demanding that the school work hard." Coming from a middle-class family, my parents are very vocal when it comes to my school work, which does push me to do better myself.
ReplyDelete